The Great Reset Rubric: Making Sense of Our Present Dystopia

The Great Reset represents the best rubric we might find for grasping much of what’s going on in the world today: the prevalence of woke ideology and cancel culture; the draconian COVID responses; the seemingly endless Antifa/BLM riots; the supposed Biden presidential victory; Big Tech censorship; and the endless stream of propaganda, double think, and gaslighting propagated by mainstream and social media. Even if not by design, as I will show, all of these seemingly disparate elements interlock in a way that support Great Reset objectives, and the Great Re-setters favor all of these developments. Likewise, once we are able to grasp the contours of the Great Reset, we will be poised to understand the reason for the prevalence of these elements and how they all interconnect and function together to produce our present dystopia. (Originally published on LotusEaters.com. February 23, 2021.)

Read More
TheAntiPCProf .
The Great Reset, Part IV: "Stakeholder Capitalism" vs. "Neoliberalism"

If anything, stakeholder capitalism represents a consumptive worm set to burrow into and hollow out corporations from within, to the degree that the ideology and practice find hosts in corporate bodies. It represents a means of socialist wealth liquidation from within capitalist organizations themselves, using any number of criteria for redistribution of benefits and “externalities.” (Originally published on the Mises Wire. February 1, 2021.)

Read More
TheAntiPCProf .
The Great Reset, Part III: Capitalism with Chinese Characteristics

A socialist-communist sequel is coming to a theater near you. Some of the same old characters are reappearing, while new ones have joined the cast. While the ideology and rhetoric sound nearly the same, they are being put to slightly different ends. This time around, the old bromides and promises are in play, and a similar but not identical bait and switch is being dangled. Socialism promises the protection of the beleaguered from the economically and politically “evil,” the promotion of the economic interests of the underclass, a benign banning of “dangerous” persons from public forums and civic life, and a primary or exclusive concern for “the common good.” China’s “One Belt, One Road” initiative may hang the takers in Africa and other underdeveloped regions as if from an infrastructural noose. A different variety is on the docket in the developed world, including in the US. (Originally published on the Mises Wire. January 1, 2021.)

Read More
TheAntiPCProf .
Thought Criminal: A new techno-thriller confronts forced conformity and enslavement by technology

Editors' note: Michael Rectenwald is a former leftist who has become one of our country’s most effective critics of the Left. After being forced out of his professorship at NYU, Dr. Rectenwald has written four books explaining the mindset, tactics and goals of the new generation of intolerant leftists -- including, Springtime for Snowflakes, Google Archipelago and Beyond Woke. Thought Criminal is his new work of fiction that parallels our present state of affairs and points to a terrifying future lying just around the corner. Kenneth Timmerman has called it “the 1984 of the Covid era.” It is Frontpage's honor to run an excerpt of Dr. Rectenwald's new book below. (Excerpt from Thought Criminal on FrontPage Magazine. November 24, 2020.)

Read More
TheAntiPCProf .
The Google Election

All but leftists realize that Big Digital corporations like Google, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn and others lean left and squelch opposing views. But few ask why they are apparently leftist, let alone satisfactorily answering the question—to my satisfaction, that is. How are we to understand the blatant and well-documented leftist bias and the censorship of non-leftist views and sites by these companies? Why leftist? Is the Internet leftist merely because those in Silicon Valley have been indoctrinated into leftism?

And, should we adopt the view that since Google, Facebook, Twitter and others are private enterprises, they can be as biased and censoring as they like? After all, aren’t these private platforms and not public utilities, with no obligation to represent views with which they disagree? They are no more obliged to do so than I am obliged to allow some Antifa member into my home to spout his, her, or zir beliefs, right?

These are the kinds of questions I hope to address in this talk. The answers should go a long way toward explaining the disavowed yet blatant attempts on the part of Big Tech Internet companies to impact the 2020 election, and much, much more.

(Presented at the Mises Institute’s Ron Paul Symposium. Lake Jackson, Texas. November 7, 2020.)

Read More
TheAntiPCProf .